Backfocus issues

As a result of my posts listing the equipment I use, I have had several emails from photographers recently asking how I overcome problems they are having with backfocus issues. I have learned from the few years of experience with my DSLR equipment, that what may at first have appeared to be backfocus problems with certain lenses I used (or cameras) was to inconsistent to be that - - - the same gear would also make dead on accurately focused images. I just learned instinctively what to look for when shooting, and camera and lens settings where these issues were minimized.

At any rate - the questions got me digging into some research this morning, and I came across the perfect logic to what I had experienced with wrong areas getting noticed and being focused on - and also why methods I ended up becoming aware of and using, worked. Here is an interesting article related to Nikon 11 point AF sensors - but may be similar with Canon cameras (so even for those hating Nikon, it is still a good read):

Pertinent info is under the subtitle "AREN'T THE AF SENSORS THE SAME SIZE AS THE VIEWFINDER'S AF BRACKETS?"

http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/d2x_sensor_size/
« Last Edit: May 21, 2007, 07:34:07 PM by Ryan Nutt »
Logged


Canons are similar.  The actual focusing censor is slightly larger than the red square on the viewfinder.  Seems to me that it would make more sense for the actual sensor to be a little smaller than the viewfinder squares. 

Brings up a story...  I was at a wedding about 2 months ago with a new Sigma 24-70 EX that replaced my trusty little 24-90 that I've had for years.  I had run quite a few shots through the Sigma beforehand to make sure it was working fine.  But when I looked at the images the next afternoon many of them were blurry.  My first thought was that the lens was a "bad copy", something that many reviewers had mentioned. After a stressful hour or so I discovered that most of the images shot with that lens were fine, and most of the really problematic ones were shot with a borrowed 28-70L which I've used in the past and has always been sharp. 

I finally looked at the EXIF and realized that my shutter speeds were slow due to how dark the venue was.  I was almost ready to box up the lens and send it back to B&H before I realized it was my fault.  I guess the point is how many other "bad copies" of lenses are really user error or not knowing the camera like the article you linked to?

2 weeks later, same lens with the camera on a tripod and a little extra lighting for formals and the shots came out perfectly sharp. 

----------

And my edit above was to fix the link.
Logged