Burning Down The Arm...

The first thing to realize is that this is my mistake.  Had I simply placed the woman on the other side of her husband, the light on her arm would not have been a problem, and she'd have been short lit, which would have been a much better option.  So, the real trick is to not have to fix this in Photoshop.

However, since I did make a mistake, and since technology is such that it is, I found a way to reduce the amount of distraction my problem made.  I have cropped the faces out of the image to protect the innocent Smiley.  I will also use false names to protect the guilty... from now on, call me Fred... or George.  Big Grin  (Ignore the name of the [im]poster, please.)

OK, so first is the original image (well, after Curves and Levels).

Attachment



Then, this is the selection I made of the woman's arm:

Attachment



And this is the layer settings I used:

Attachment



And this is the final result, obviously much better, but still natural looking:

Attachment



Thanks for reading this,
Fred... or George

P.S.  Do it right the first time, or you too will be forced to burn someone down!  And then they make you change your name, and start trying to find ways to get out of the country, and...
Logged


Thanks Fred/George!
I actually just tried that on the leg of one of my models.  She was laying on the bed on her stomach with her legs in the air, ankles crossed, and I was dumb enough to put the light on the side her legs were one, this was wrong for two reasons, a) she ended up broad lit, which fortunately wasn't too bad on her, and b) it over lit her legs, should have used barn doors, but on that note... I should have just done everything correct in the first place.  Smiley

Anyway, everyone notice that Travis/Fred/George changed the "normal" on the drop down list to "multiply".  That part is easy to miss.
Logged


Excellent tutorial Travis, thanks for the help for future work.

A side note, people's skin vary in color, usually, the lightest is further away from the light, but, in some cases like this one, even if you lighting is perfect, a light skin individual may need some work.

No, there's no such thing as a perfect shot, all need some slight tweaking, and there's nothing wrong in doing so.
Logged


Travis!  Did you know that the brush has a multiply option?  It works really well too.  I just started with a soft brush at a really low opacity and brushed it on a few times until it looked natural.
Make sure you sample a color from a darker part of their skin that doesn't have a lot of grey in it though.
 
Logged


Actually, I did know that.  Thanks for the ideas though.  It is definitely a good way to go if that's your preference.

Might I suggest playing around with the two options, though.  The reason is that a brush will have a tendency to overlap edges and side of brush strokes, so it can be somewhat inconsistent (this could also be a reason to prefer it), whereas the layer can be used to make a very even adjustment over a specific area.  Another option would be to not make a selection at all and just apply the Multipy to the entire layer, mask it all with black, and then paint back white in the area you want it showing through.  This could almost give you the best of both worlds, because you could paint back different 'opacities' in varying areas in the image as well.

Just more food for thought.

Travis
Logged


I went with the brush because in the image I am working on right now I am trying to tone down tan lines.  I was conscious about the overlapping thing, but maybe the masking will work better.  Thanks.
Logged