Reply #6 - October 01, 2008, 09:54:01 AM
I thought long and hard about composition and the reason my list was made the way it was is from my own faults/talents.
Exposure took me the longest to learn and composition (although I am not perfect) came easier to me. Composition is like grammar to me, for the most part I can hear if something sounds right but I know the rules that vary from that.
The other thing is that a perfectly composed image is worthless if it's too dark or two bright but a perfectly exposed image can be valuable even with composition flaws if they aren't horrible.
Ok, this is what I did last night. I set my camera on Auto and took my four year old daughter outside for some example shots. This is what I took to compare what I am teaching:
To compare lighting:
One shot with her in full sun
One shot with her in open shade
To compare backgrounds and how auto exposure works:
One with her against a bright background (she turned out dark)
One with her against a medium/darker background (she is exposed properly)
To teach composition/posing:
One shooting down on her
One on her level
One shot with her tiny in the frame
One shot zoomed in with her filling the frame
I also took the best shot and post processed it just to show that shooting in open shade is likely to make your subject bluish and that they can use their photo editing software to warm it up.
I am focusing on shooting outdoors. I honestly am not sure I would have much valuable knowledge about shooting indoors with a point and shoot with a pop up flash. I have a swivel head flash that I bounce off everything from ceilings to reflectors to men's white shirts. I use two flashes sometimes, and also things like dragging my shutter and high ISO. All things I don't think a point and shoot does.

Logged