First macro to show you

Pages [1] 2
Not had much spare time lately, but found half an hour this week to look around the garden and find this one.

Logged


WOW, too bad he wasn't holding his wings still.  That's incredible.  Good job.
Logged


Wait!!! What are you using?! Lens, camera, etc!

Wonderful shot. Wow! Can you give us the EXIF data? f/stop, shutterspeed, iso, etc?
Logged

Comments and Harsh Critiques gladly accepted. My photos are ok to edit.

My photos and art: http://wildmaven.org

Wow...I didn't know bees (wasps?) had that much detail. Lol. That is amazing! I'd also like to know the details (lens, camera, f-stop, shutter, etc...) Great job!!
Logged


I didn't even want to ask what equipment and settings were used.  I know I can never make a shot like this.

It makes you want to look forever at all the detail.
Logged


I think its looking at me!
One of those images that seems like the eyes follow you from all angles.

nicely captured.
love the use of DOF. (Im focusing on this area of the art right now)

Corey
Logged

Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes.

Oscar Wilde

Thanks for the comments everyone one! Here's the info:

Camera : Canon 20D
Lens:    Tamron 90mm Macro lens - 1:1 magnification
Extension tube: 25mm
iso: 100
Exposure: Manual
Lighting: 430 ex Flash
Shutter speed: 1/160
Aperture: f14
Shot in RAW

Home made diffuser fitted to flash (made from cardboard and a plastic milk carton)

That's about it really  Smiley

Logged


Excellent capture of the Hoverfly.
Have you a top view? I can probably give you an Identification.

Susie, the wings are still, it's the body that is in focus for this shot. Greater DOF needed for the wings. Remember, macro is different to what you are used to.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2008, 09:26:24 PM by Mike Hodgson »
Logged


Dave, I love the image as well.  Macro is something I really intend to do someday myself.

I have a question for you though... Is the diffuser necessary on the flash?  Isn't the light source much larger than the subject anyway, so you should be able to get a very soft light without the use of modifiers?  I really don't know, so feel free to educate me on this.

Travis
Logged


It's a great idea, Travis, however, in most cases, a macro ring light is used which Canon makes or Nikon has this system
http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/ProductDetail.page?pid=4803

When I did macro, I always allowed the sun to be my source of light. I especially liked shooting during hazy days.

This is a crisp shot,
I would prefer to see a three dimensional view instead of one, it gives the viewer exactly what it is they are viewing. The front of the hoverfly is something else to see, huge eyes, a dangly thing in the front, micro hairs, then there's the back, there are beautiful markings which can be a quick way to identify the species of hoverfly.
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 07:31:38 AM by Mike Hodgson »
Logged


another thing of note is he isn't 1 inch away from the bee. hence the flash is also too far away to not need a modifier of some sort.

Very good job!! I need to go dragon fly shooting....
Logged

-----------------------------------
"I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one heck of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult. "- EB White

Chattanooga Photographer www.BobEdens.com

Susie, the wings are still, it's the body that is in focus for this shot. Greater DOF needed for the wings. Remember, macro is different to what you are used to.

Oh Yeah!  I see the detail on the wings where they are close to the body.  Thanks Mike.
Logged


Bob, it's not a Bee, it's a Fly, Hoverfly.   Big Grin
Logged


Dave, I love the image as well.  Macro is something I really intend to do someday myself.

I have a question for you though... Is the diffuser necessary on the flash?  Isn't the light source much larger than the subject anyway, so you should be able to get a very soft light without the use of modifiers?  I really don't know, so feel free to educate me on this.

Travis

Well Travis I understand what you're saying and it makes sense to me too, but it does look very contrasty and harsh without the diffuser. The device I made is also to move the point of light forward to the end of the lens. Imagine the lens plus tubes - it is quite long - and the insect can be very close to the lens. Because of this the lens blocks the light from the shoe mounted gun. The cardboard device is like a funnel on the flash head with the diffuser at the end.

There are better but not cheaper ways to achieve this, but I think it works well for my needs.

Mike, I'm sorry you feel it's one dimensional, maybe you can explain what you feel is wrong?
Logged


Nothing wrong, Dave    Big Grin

3 dimensional view?

Front, side and top.   Big Grin  position of view.

I find "profiles" o.k. but, when we see dimensions the subject becomes more interesting.

1 dimensional is basic, which looks great, explore in your POV, Position of view.

Even a head on shot would look great, a profile, even in portraiture is not often done, unless, the photographer is aiming for artistic effect.

Don't get me wrong, I like the capture, excellent details. I'm only speaking from experience.
Logged


Pages [1] 2