Get a load of this!

Yes folks, it's a brave new world out there.  Smiley

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/ptech/06/14/low.light.photos.ap/index.html

Makes you wonder if Nikon had been tipped off?

mike
Logged

The smart person learns from their own mistakes.
The Wise person learns from the mistakes of others!

Looks like the potential is there for this to be a big deal.  Can't say that I really understand exactly how the filters work so I have to fixate on the "better photo in low light" part of the story and not the technology behind it.

Quote
The technology is likely to be incorporated first in mass-market point-and-shoot cameras and camera-equipped mobile phones beginning sometime next year.
Seems backwards to me. 
Logged


In my opinion this is known for months by the industry. These companies have such enormous resources of knowledge, they often know what will be the nex move a few months ahead.

I don't think this invention by Kodak will be that revolutionary; it comes down to one or two stops. It is an improvement of course, but not that ground breaking.
Logged


If you can get 7 or  8 stops of dynamic range and the noise @ ISO 3200 out of a DSLR, I'd take it.

It would be nice if they could retrofit my D200!  If ifs and buts were candy and nuts...  Wink
Logged

The smart person learns from their own mistakes.
The Wise person learns from the mistakes of others!

All right, so I'm a little slow; what do you mean by Nikon being tipped off?  Do they have a new product using this technology?

Travis
Logged


Here are a few more posts on the filter.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2007/06/kodaks_brillian.html
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0706/07061401kodakhighsens.asp
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/15/148219
Logged


Moreover, if this means an extra one or two stops: why is this so revolutionary? My Fuji S3 offers this for a few years allready!
Logged


I think the biggest issue is that now cameras with really small sensors are going to have less crummy pictures in dark areas.  I would assume that since cameras with larger sensors tend to do better in the dark anyway this would be less beneficial, although that's just a fairly wild guess. 

But I'm sort of with you Leen.  I don't think this is as big of a deal as it's being made out to be.
Logged


Ok lets look at it in a business view, who is making the filter? Kodak, what is Kodaks primary market now? Point and shoot camera's Kodak closed its wedding business in the UK this year to concentrate on the consumer market. This filter will mean nothing to the pro photographer hell I can go and buy the S5 Pro and get the added 2 stops in darkness and less noise and more grain feel. what it will make a difference for is the millions of kodak point and shoots that will have this fitted as standard. We are the guiniee pig to see if it works for the wider market and that is something we should always remember.
Logged