Catchlight in her eyes.

Pages [1] 2 3
Thanks Ginnypenny for the diagram positioning the catchlight. I have to agree with you that a dead-on-center of the eye catchlight looks odd. Now that I am aware of it, it bugs me when I see it. It is one of those many subtile things that make a difference in the engaging aspect of the subjects eyes. I have had many good and helpful critiques in the last few days and I appreciate them a lot. I have a list of improvements and lighting techniques I am looking forward to using at my next shoot. I posted this image of Oksana to show the difference it makes when the catchlight is positioned away from the center of the pupil. This eye reflection was added in PS to an image that had a centered catchlight. To see Ginnypenny's diagram of a catchlight look at topic "New poster".
Attachments
 Oksana.Brazil copy.278SM - 240.96 KB - 99 views

Logged


Catch lights are about light positioning NOT processing.
In this image, your lighting was too low, as seen by shadow of nose on her left side. It also appears that there was PS shadow of nose going down to lip.

Other then that, nicely composed, I like the pose
Logged


Mike is right about the catchlight, however, I have changed catchlights in PS occassionally.  Usually, like I said before, I just clone out the second one, but I have also moved them, or even copied one from one eye to the other if the second one is missing or not as bright, although you have to be careful doing that, if the eye is in shadow it will look odd to have a catchlight.
I have never had luck just adding one with a paint brush, they don't look real to me.
Logged


Mike, I see what you mean. I can also see that I need to pay way more attention to this type of detail. Oksana mentioned that she didn't like the shadow on her cheek, so it is my blind spot here. I really need to slow down and think of each exposure as the best one I can do. I am not going deep enough into the process. I will get the lighting position down first. The shadow going down to the lip is natural not PS, probably could have been dodged, but I agree, better to do it right with lighting initially.

Ginnypenny, very interesting idea about cloning out and in. I was aware of the eye being in shadow in the attached image, but decided to add the catchlight anyway. The PS brush had a slightly diffused edge. I put it on a layer and toggled it first to see if it was believable, I thought it was so I put it in. Again, this is a process of heightening my visual acuity and I appreciate the comments. I have been studying the lighting in the work of Bruno Bernard from the 40s and 50s. He gets a richness I like, particularly in his black and white work.
Logged


Ginnypenny: Here is Kate with catchlights and more contrast. As I look at this image I still feel that it is somewhat flat. There are no shadows on the face to sculpt the form. It is a more relaxed pose, eyes are more alive, less red in terms of skin tones. Again, help me here. I probably will not post until a do another shoot and use all of your and Mike's suggestions. All day shoot on Saturday with a pro MUA. I'll see how it gos with the butterfly lighting, again a higher positioning of light source will help me. I am wide open for suggestions.
Attachments
 DSC_008SM.jpg - 242.02 KB - 94 views

Logged


Practice practice practice, the more you do, the more you'll see what the light does.

I know placing catch lights in eyes is done in P.S. one must study where the light is coming from before placing catch lights, but, if done right in lighting, no worries in P.S. right ?

Your light is at Models Left, the catch light is at Model's right.

I personally and in my opinion would rather see "Natural" catch lights, I find Sharp catch lights in eyes done in P.S. too fake.

As for the kind of lighting, IE butterfly etc. try all kinds, see what works best on her.

Look for Ed Shapiro Lighting Essays here on the forum he also has some on poses etc.
Better yet, look for any of Ed's responses to postings, you'll find a wealth of info. 
Logged


Yes, just practice, a lot.  Butterfly lighting is not perfect for everyone.  I do use it a lot and my makeup artist knows this and will use makeup to and a little contouring to the face.
I have found that butterfly lighting works really well with a harder light source (move your light back) and that modified loop lighting works better with softer light (use a modifier like a soft box and move it as close to their face as possible).  However as you are practicing you might want to use a soft light source for both, it's more forgiving.
Logged


Mike: Yes the catchlight look fake, wrong position. I will work at getting natural ones. I'll check out Ed Shapiro's posted tutorials on lighting. BTW, I sent him and email yesterday telling him I appreciate his comments on others work and hoped he would comment on my as well. Good info for sure, thanks again and I will keep practicing. Wanting an effect and getting the effect can be worlds apart!
Logged


Ginnypenny: This lighting thing is a monster! I have been shooting with a tungsten light through an umbrella or bounced from inside the umbrella and filled with a flood or white reflector. I would like to try a soft box, I have never used one. I see I need to start experimenting more. I can see my work improve though so that is good. I'll try the butterfly lighting in several light positions, thanks. I will also try a white reflector as well as a silver one. Right now I don't even know what loop lighting is. Thank you for your valuable comments.
Logged


Soft boxes are pricey.  Ritz/Inkleys has really affordable white umbrellas ($14 or $19, I think). You can shoot through them or bounce light off them by turning them around.  I use one umbrella and one softbox and for a hairlight I use a homemade modifier/snoot out of aluminum foil.  I can mold it to fit how big of a beam of light I want.  Just turn off the modeling light after you have positioned it, it gets hot!

Get a good book that shows lighting patterns!  This is invaluable!
Logged


Ginnypenny: Thanks for the info I will check it out. Modeling light... good. Had a good shoot yesterday with Oksana, she wore a white dress outside in the sun. I have a lot of overexposed shots even though I used all kind of settings. I do have a few in shade that are very good I will share when I can. My strobe light slave arrives on the 27th, then more stuff to learn about strobe lighting.
Logged


Do you have a light meter?
Logged


Blush.  Shocked( Make a recommendation please. C'mon now don't laugh.
Logged


Sekonic L 358
Logged


ummmmm.... I don't remember the brand I have, my husband would know.
I think it may be a Sekonic.

They aren't cheap, but they will help you measure your light from your flash, from the sun, whatever.  Then you can start balancing them.  You will need to learn light ratios.  I like using ratios that aren't harsh.  For example, let's say using your meter you get the sun at 5.6 by adjusting your shutter speed.  Then you could set your light to an f-stop of 8.  Then you have a 2:1 ratio with the electric light as your main and the sun as your fill.  Does this make any sense?  Am I going to deep?  The point I am trying to make is that once you get a light meter you have control.  Learning light ratios and patterns isn't exactly a cake walk, but it's not super hard and once you get the hang of the basics you can work on those until you master it (which I dare say 99% of photographers are still trying to do).  For example, I have only had a light meter for just over a year (when I put together my own studio) and I don't know how in the world I was shooting for so long before that. 
Logged


Pages [1] 2 3