It's foggy in Hockley today.

So I took advantage of it this morning.
Attachments
 _MG_9879.jpg - 115.54 KB - 53 views

 _MG_9882.jpg - 115.75 KB - 53 views

 _MG_9899.jpg - 92.19 KB - 55 views

Logged

-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.
"There is no Un-Suck filter" David duChemin

Check out the new blog. http://www.jklebphoto.wordpress.com

Love the train tracks and the bridge.  The fog adds that sense of mystery that makes the shots.
Logged

If you always do what you have always done, you will always get what you have always got.

Fog used to give me fits. So now I go shoot in it every chance I get. I'm starting to understand how to use it a bit now.
Logged

-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.
"There is no Un-Suck filter" David duChemin

Check out the new blog. http://www.jklebphoto.wordpress.com

John, I'm interested as to why fog gives you fits?  I've always found it quite easy to meter, but was wondering if there is something specific you are trying to get that is eluding you.  These are great, but I'd like to take a little off the left of the second image, and maybe trim both sides of the bridge just a bit.  At least try it and see what you think, I think there's a little imbalance in the space in them.  There is nothing necessarily wrong with the train tracks, but it's not really creating a strong impact with me.  I think it needs some type of element to create tension in the image.  I'm seeing a little boy sitting on one of the tracks looking to the outer edge of the frame, far enough back in the image that it's not a portrait of him, so he is just a part of the scene, but so he adds some additional questions/thoughts/interaction within the image.  Just an idea... it needs a little something extra though I think.

Travis
Logged


Quote
John, I'm interested as to why fog gives you fits?
I had problems not being able to bring what I saw onto print. Exposure was easy enough to figure out. It was problems for getting the image to carry the same ethereal qualities I saw and felt when I was making them.

Quote
At least try it and see what you think, I think there's a little imbalance in the space in them.
Done. I see what you were talking about. Now they almost look to boxy to me, I want to keep the elements proportioned the same but stretch it out for a more languid look.

Quote
There is nothing necessarily wrong with the train tracks, but it's not really creating a strong impact with me.  I think it needs some type of element to create tension in the image.  I'm seeing a little boy sitting on one of the tracks looking to the outer edge of the frame, far enough back in the image that it's not a portrait of him, so he is just a part of the scene, but so he adds some additional questions/thoughts/interaction within the image.

lol, I often said that I need to keep throw down models in the truck. There was a few times I was looking at a scene and wishing I had a person, or a cow, or something to thrwo a human element into the scene.
Attachments
 _MG_9882.jpg - 136.71 KB - 34 views

 _MG_9899.jpg - 104.86 KB - 34 views

Logged

-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.
"There is no Un-Suck filter" David duChemin

Check out the new blog. http://www.jklebphoto.wordpress.com

Quote
It was problems for getting the image to carry the same ethereal qualities I saw and felt when I was making them.
I definitely understand that.  But then, I have that problem no matter what I'm shooting Smiley.  Sorry I don't think I can be of any help for you on the matter.

Quote
Now they almost look to boxy to me, I want to keep the elements proportioned the same but stretch it out for a more languid look.
I have to agree.  The proportion of the frame was better without the cropping.  Hmmm, they were still very good the way you had them originally; maybe you should just keep them that way.  If you don't mind, could I download these and try a thing or two on them?

Travis
Logged


Quote
If you don't mind, could I download these and try a thing or two on them?
Sure
Logged

-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.
"There is no Un-Suck filter" David duChemin

Check out the new blog. http://www.jklebphoto.wordpress.com

Well, they're kind of quick and unrefined, but maybe...

On the bridge, I copied some of the trees from the right side, flipped them, stretched them, and placed them on the left side as well.  I think it closed up some of that corner and focused the viewer a little more without cropping.  Then I did just a touch of burning over there as well for the same reason.  I also posted a version with the entire image flipped; I don't know that it's better, but it definitely changes the way you experience the image.  Of course, it's up to your interpretation of what you wanted originally.

Attachment

Attachment


On the pond, I did very little.  I tried a lot of things, such as cropping the left side and then stretching the right side so it would move back into the more rectangular format; but it didn't make a huge difference.  Primarily on the attached image, all I did was select some of the ?pine? tree on the right and blend it into the left just to fill in and soften some of the edge of the image along the upper left.  Kind of like applying a texture to just that area.  I think at the very least, the edge of the image isn't so harsh and 'wraps' into the corner a little better.

Attachment


Nothing big really, and I'm not sure anything made a huge difference.  Just a couple of more ideas maybe.

Thanks for letting me try at least,
Travis
Logged


this post got past me. I didnt see it until the bridge was in the featured image box.

The bridge reminds me of a mesh of ansel and mutter.

very cool
Logged