RSS Twitter

Photo Arts Forum

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Welcome to PAF!

Welcome to PhotoArtsForum.com. We're a spot where you can discuss all things photographic; from portraiture, to nature, to equipment, to whatever else. Feel free to browse around and read whatever interests you. When you're ready, please consider registering for an account and joining our little corner of the internet.

Author Topic: Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?  (Read 359 times)

Ryan

  • Administrator
  • PAF Guru
  • Posts: 2,554
    • ProofBuddy
Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?
« on: July 29, 2011, 10:49:11 AM »
Haven't done much printing in the past few months, but I tend to find myself liking photos that aren't the standard 2:3 proportion.I think it just looks too much like a snapshot.

For whatever reason, and I'm sure there's some research somewhere that would explain it, I like images with either a square proportion or that are pushing panoramic. I've done several 12x24 inch prints and keep coming back to that size.

Aside for history, is there really any reason to stick with 2:3? Guess as it's a standard there are frames and such already available.It was tough to find glass for a 7.5x54" panoramic I did a few years ago.

Marian Murdoch

  • PAF Guru
  • Posts: 3,039
    • Marian Murdoch Photography
Re: Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2011, 02:23:08 PM »
I, too, love odd sizes, but I have to stick with conventional ones for my work, as it makes it easier for the purchaser to find frames for it. People are more likely to buy your work if they don't have to do any work after the purchase.

Ryan

  • Administrator
  • PAF Guru
  • Posts: 2,554
    • ProofBuddy
Re: Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2011, 07:35:54 PM »
Do you ever sell your stuff already framed? Or is that just too much trouble?

BobEdens

  • Global Moderator
  • PAF Guru
  • Posts: 3,066
  • Osprey
    • Bob Edens Photography
Re: Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2011, 10:09:00 PM »
We're pretty much tied to that format as long as its considered a "normal" or "stock" frame size.

On a good note, 1x3 is getting more popular, its pretty easy to find a 12x36 frame now.
as well as square.

Only when we can sell our art/photos for enough money that the frame becomes an insignificant expense will the cost of the frame not matter.


-----------------------------------
Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before. -- Mae West

Chattanooga Portrait Photographer BobEdens.com

Marian Murdoch

  • PAF Guru
  • Posts: 3,039
    • Marian Murdoch Photography
Re: Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2011, 10:59:51 PM »
Do you ever sell your stuff already framed? Or is that just too much trouble?

Heavy as hell, breakage like crazy if you're not careful. Been there, done that, never again. ;)

jkleb

  • PAF Guru
  • Posts: 1,535
  • Wrench Ninja
    • J. Kleb Photography
Re: Why 2:3? Favorite proportions?
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2011, 07:03:23 AM »
What I try to explain to people is that you can still buy a standard sized frame and mat the photo to fit the frame. You want a mat anyway to give an airspace between the glass and the print. It doesn't always work if you have something truly oddball like a 12x60, but most of the time it's good. I do 99% of my art prints to fit in a 16x20 frame doing this, but rarely is it a true 4x5 format print. I also usually print it using 11x14 paper since I'm matting everything anyway. I used to buy full sheet mat board and cut it myself, but it's just too hard to handle in my space. Now I buy the full sheets (usually 4 or 5 sheets each of mat and foamcore backing) and just have the frame store cut them into 4 pieces. Save time and frustration while making the prints look better.
-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.
"There is no Un-Suck filter" David duChemin

Check out the new blog. http://www.jklebphoto.wordpress.com

 


BloQcs design by Bloc
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal