Janine: natural light at the park

This is what I shot last Friday at the park. I set it on AV, 800 ISO (Looking at the pictures later though, I'm wondering if this was my mistake because of the amount of grain I got on pictures that should have been crisp), and I believe my F-stop was 5.0.

I'm open to comments and suggestions. Although I like these, I feel like something is missing from them.
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
Logged


#2
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
Logged


I'm not sure about the cropping on this one. Any ideas are welcome.
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
Logged

~Lauren~

http://www.myspace.com/laursphotos
http://www.modelmayhem.com/laursphotography

1. is nice, catchlights and all. If there could be more range between the white and black her tat would show better.
(lots of fiddling with curves may do it)

2. couple of hot spots, its a nice composition but the portrait guys are going to point out that not only is it an armpit shot its also up her nose. (I think she has an attractive arm pit.. [grin])

3. Best one, playful. I would put her in the upper right third of the image and let the extra grass be more or less "dead space"

This one, would be better in color, I think

I don't like the contrast (or lack of) in any of them. Might be my laptop, might be me... [shrug]
Logged

-----------------------------------
There are two ways to live: you can live as if nothing is a miracle or you can live as if everything is a miracle. ~ Albert Einstein ~

I think the first one needs contrast.  Bob nailed the problems on the second, armpit and nose, but the blacks and whites are better.
I love the third one, I would personally crop it square, or if you had the space I would have cropped so she was more on the right side of the frame with grass on the left.
Either way, 800 ISO is way high for outdoors.  That's what I shoot in dark reception halls.  I try really hard never to go higher than 200 ISO.  100 is perfect for a nice bright day, I think.  Some people don't mind grain, I can't stand it in the least, that's my own issue.  I will go back and look at the lighting on your subject in just a second.
Logged


Lighting is fine.  It's best on your third one.
The first one doesn't have much light in her eyes, but it works fine for me. 
None of the lighting is dynamic and interesting or perfect portrait lighting... but it's fine, it works.  Good job.
Logged


800 ISO is way high for outdoors.  That's what I shoot in dark reception halls.  I try really hard never to go higher than 200 ISO.  100 is perfect for a nice bright day

I'm not sure if it would make a difference, but it was really cloudy that evening, it was about 6:30-7 pm by the time we were shooting the ones on the grass. At the beginning (6pm?) I was having problems getting it to expose correctly (they kept coming out really dark). That was why I bumped it up to 800, then I had a "DUH" moment and realized that F16 was a small hole and not large, so I opened it to F5, but forgot to reset the ISO.

I'll try to post the color versions when I get home tonight.
Logged


Lauren, I will be honest.  I shoot in P mode (basically auto but you can use exposure compensation) outside.  I use manual in the studio or in tough situations.  I believe that camera makers spend a lot of time and effort when developing the way a camera's auto functions work and I doubt I can do a better job unless I am using a light meter, which essentially is what my camera is using.  I have tricks.  I zoom in and expose for the skin, I am good at guessing how to compensate for the exposure based on the fairness or darkness of their skin. 
I told that long story to tell you that I don't really know what you should have shot at.  As Mike and the sunny 16 rule state, F16 is good for sunny days.  With it being cloudy and later in the day I would have used an auto mode, IF the shutter speed wasn't fast enough I would have shot in shutter priority to get the speed and let the camera pick the f-stop.  I still keep that ISO at 200 if possible.
When doing portrait work I like to shoot with my aperture wide open, for better depth of field (blur that background if you can).

That's how I do it... you don't have to.  Keep practicing.  Your images have potential, they aren't bad.  I have seen a lot worse when people are starting out.
Logged



Top of Page