Model at Train

Pages [1] 2
Ok, I posted my daughter's pics at the train, here is the real deal.  I like them, but they are totally my style, so it's probably subjective.
Attachments
 Taylor 188small.jpg - 157.12 KB - 69 views

 Taylor 162small.jpg - 158.67 KB - 69 views

Logged


I should mention I used the sun in these, and countered it with my flash.  This took care of the color cast I was getting in the practice session and made the sun not as harsh.  I don't even have a bracket for this camera, so it was right on my hot shoe.
Logged


I love to shoot around trains.

The first photo I hate the tilt. It may be that I'm the only one but the tilt and her broken hand and the conduit and switch are all I notice, besides she does have great legs... [grin]

If you stepped to your right you might have missed the conduit and then her poor crippled hand would be behind her (I'm messing with you here, pull that lip back)

The second photo I really like. You might could have sped up your shutter to make the train a bit darker except the part lit by the flash. Now you could probably darken the image with curves then mask out the girl and the parts of the train around her like there was a spotlight on her. And please clone out that white dot on the right.
Love the idea and pose, I'll probably steal it..
Logged

-----------------------------------
Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before. -- Mae West

Chattanooga Portrait Photographer BobEdens.com

Thanks Bob, I will clone out the spot.  A tip for the pose on the stairs - Have your model actually grab the pole.  I hate how her palm is just press against the rail.  I didn't notice at the time. 

I have non-tilted shots from the area in the first image.  I will be editing those too.  I am going to tell you though that I do like the tilt, perhaps I am just seeing different things.  Smiley
« Last Edit: August 28, 2008, 12:40:37 PM by Ginnypenny »
Logged


another one, for fun.
Attachments
 Taylor 198small.jpg - 150.23 KB - 67 views

Logged


I should note that these are for her portfolio.  She is 16.  I am not doing much touchup work on her for that reason.  Not that she needs it, she has great skin.
I am darkening her lashes though, that's just cosmetic.
Logged


Yep, you did well.

Ladies with having not so skinny legs, in most part, have them put their weight on the back leg and elegantly place the front leg no weight. In order to see where I'm coming from, have a look at dance studio poses.
Ooops, I forgot you know already.    Big Grin
Logged


Nice shots.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2008, 09:44:23 AM by Teqy1 »
Logged


Susie,

Image 1:  The severed arm is an issue, but I am not crazy about the pidgeon toes or the position of her right arm.  I also think that she is looking too high. 

Image 2:  I like this better!  I agree that she shold be grabbing the handrail, but I don't think that it is a big problem.  One way to avoid this problem is to make sure that you never shoot into the flat of the hand.  Either the back or the palm.  Always try to shoot hand from the side.  I had this beaten into me by Monte Zucker and it has solved problems like this a number of times.  It doesn't help you fix the problem, but it makes sure that you see it before you shoot!.

Image 3:  Cutting off her leg was a mistake.  She is also very square to the camera.  Have her turn to her left a little would put her shoulder to the wall and slim her shoulders and waist. 

BTW:  I love the processing on these . . . they remind me of Cindy's work.

I forgot that you shoot with a D80 . . . interesting . . .

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

Ed
Thank you so much for the thoughtful critique.  I think I sever limbs all the time...  It's hard to pose people with props without doing it.  I will work on that though, it is obviously an issue.

I wasn't trying to copy Cindy, but I will take that as a compliment.  I think Cindy has a more dreamy style than I do, if that makes sense.  We do both seem to like saturation.  I don't always do such intense color/contrast, but I love it when images call for it.

I actually wrote an action to do this treatment and called it "Yellow Train", lol, I meant it only for this session but I am using it on a recent wedding and LOVE it.  I'll have to figure out how to rename actions.

And yeah, I shoot with a D80.  I have had to learn how to tame the beast.  I hated it for outdoor work at first.  I think it's a dynamic range issue or something.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2008, 05:59:57 PM by Ginnypenny »
Logged


Right out of the box, I didn't like the images from my D80 either, but there is a lot of control in that menu system.

You can easily rename actions by renaming the file that contains them.  If I was at home, on my own computer, I could tell you where that is, but this is my wife's laptop.

I did mean it as a compliment when I compared these to Cindy's work!  I was referring to the colors and the setting.

Keep it up!


Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

The file the actions are in?  Do you mean if you find the file on the computer, not in Photoshop, you can rename them there?

I do like my D80 now, and will probably be replacing my husband's Olympus with another one.  Although I have heard the D40 is actually a better camera.  I think I read that on Ken Rockwell...  Obviously I would love the latest and greatest, but sometimes I think it's just like driving a race car around town to do your errands when a little fuel efficent Prius will do the trick, and well.


Logged


Ha, ha . . . Nikon just annouced the D90!

I don't think that Ken Rockwell said that the D40 is a better camera, he said that it is all the camera that he needs.  That is a very different statement.  For example, I need a camera that supports a vertical grip/battery pack.  I have big hands and even the D200 is too small for me to carry all day without the grip. 

I haven't been reading Ken's stuff for some time . . . I have to get back over there and see what he has to say these days.

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

eh, I don't remember where I heard it.  I just pulled Ken's name out of the air because I do read his stuff.  And yes, those were different statements.  If I bought the D40 it would be for a backup camera.  So I figure it's good enough, seriously.
You should all know by now I DON'T keep up with technology, my cell phone is old and can't do anything, no pictures, no texting, it just makes and takes phone calls.  It costs me $10 a month and works spectacularly for my needs.  I'm practical Smiley
Logged


btw, I buy into the fact that chasing the lastest technology doesn't make you good at using it.  I still have a lot of learning to do with what I got.
Logged


Pages [1] 2