Monopods, tripods, and ballheads

Figure I'd split this off from the elk thread since it's pretty far off topic, but seemed lkke a good gear talk.

Up until I started using bigger and better glass I never really worried too much about a tripod or monopod.  But a 70-200 f/2.8 is a fairly heavy lens, and I'd imagine it gets harder to handhold the bigger the lens gets.

What I did was to move the pan-tilt head back and forth between my tripod and monopod.  It helped with the weight, and the images sure were clearer, but I still found myself adjusting the head too much to be quick.  Last summer I found myself at a wedding in a really dark church with only one tripod, and really needed a couple.  We rigged a light stand to hold a camera for my wife, but that's a different topic.  We went out the next Monday and bought a new tripod.  The first one I bought several years ago and didn't really know what I wanted.  I remember being surprised how much they cost so it was one of the cheaper bases and heads.  This time I knew I wanted something lighter, a little taller, and I figured I'd try a ball head. 

Between the ball head letting me change angles quickly and the lens collar allowing me to switch from horizontal to vertical with a single motion I find myself using the tripod and monopod a lot more often, and I know my shots are clearer because of it. 

I'm tempted to try a pistol grip style ball head, but I also don't want to have too many different types of heads so that I don't have to think too much when I'm using them.  It's already hard enough going back and forth between a ball head and pan-tilt head.
Logged


I use4 an old pan-tilt on a tripod my dad got back in the early eighties. The tripod is an aluminum battleship, but it works well. If I ever get some really big glass or buy some sheet film for my sister-in-laws 4x5 I have something to put them on. Because of the high price of a good tripod and ball head I'm still using this old beast. I played around with a good Bogen Manfrotto set up at a camera store but balked at shelling out over $500 for it. I really liked it but the bank account said no. If I start doing more events or dynamic situations I'll have to bite the bullet and get a good tripod and go for a ball head this time. I didi like it beter tham the pan-tilt. Since most of the things I'm shooting now aren't going anywhere anytime soon I'll stick with what i've got.
I also have a super cheap compact pan-tilt that came with a little camera I bought for my wife that I do carry sometimes. I works good when I'm foot downtown because it's lightweight and fits in the backpack when folded up. It's pretty flimsy and get out of balance with an SLR on it so I have to be extra careful when I use it.
Logged

-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.

At an event I used a nice tripod that Travis owns (he's not around lately because he is moving).  I loved it, I think it had a thing that you squeeze to release it so you can move your camera around then you let go to lock it.  I can't remember, it's been a long time.  I would love something like that, but yeah, they are pricey.
Logged


My legs are Bogen 3001PRO, about $135 if I remember right.  They are aluminum and completely sufficient for a SLR I think.  Maybe not enough for a view camera.  I am currently using a pistol grip style ball head (Bogen 322RC2) that runs about $125 I think.  $260 isn't cheap, but it's a lot less than $500.  Also, I don't see the need to replace it anytime soon.  I pack this setup on a backpack in the mountains and under extreme conditions, I have had in very cold weather and it has been through some severe beatings.  I am not easy on equipment.  I use it in my home studio and on location, for wildlife, landscapes, portraits, in machine shops, in churches, you name it.  It goes everywhere my camera goes.  I don't think it is very expensive at all when you consider all that I do with it.  However I understand that no funds makes everything expensive, I've been there also so I'm not judging or trying to be pushy.  Any tripod is better than no tripod for sure, but I'm very happy with mine and I have no intention of ever going back to the light-duty ones.  I would like a carbon-fiber one, but I can't really justify it as I'm young enough and healthy enough that the slightly heavier aluminum isn't a problem for me.

I will offer a suggestion though concerning ball heads; the pistol grip is not useable for fast moving subjects like sports action or flying birds.  I've missed more shots than I'd care to admit because of it.  My recommendation for this is a small, light-duty ball head on a monopod so you have freedom of movement and agility with your equipment.  I am not coordinated enough to squeeze the grip on my head with my left hand and maneuver the camera while trying to press the shutter with my right hand and keep anything moving in the viewfinder.  The pistol grip is good when I can position my camera and then leave it while I shoot.  If you want to move the camera and shoot the pistol grip style is a hindrance in my opinion.

Travis
Logged


I tend to use a ball head just tight enough to hold the camera and force it to whatever position without loosening it. tends to wear them but three years and the same ones are fine. matching heads on the tripod and monopod and the same hotshoe on everything including wife's tripod.
Logged

-----------------------------------
"I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one heck of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult. "- EB White

Chattanooga Photographer www.BobEdens.com