PhotoShop vs Website displyLibrary Thread

Pages [1] 2 3
I just posted "Cowboy" in the Professional Critique board. When I did so, the saturation was waaaaaaaaaay down from how I had it in photoshop. So I moved this forum to the side, exposing the image displayed in photoshop next to it and made a screencap. Why such a difference? It is the exact same file.

Logged

Comments and Harsh Critiques gladly accepted. My photos are ok to edit.

My photos and art: http://wildmaven.org

weird, was it too big to post and it got compressed here for the site???
Logged


The normal answer to that question is that it's a color space issue.  sRGB is usually the suggestion.   Part of it is also that web browsers don't always load a color profile or may not load the same one as Photoshop. 
Logged


The normal answer to that question is that it's a color space issue.  sRGB is usually the suggestion.   Part of it is also that web browsers don't always load a color profile or may not load the same one as Photoshop. 

I see. It makes me want to be a bit more generous when commenting on someone's saturation levels here now. Smiley
Logged

Comments and Harsh Critiques gladly accepted. My photos are ok to edit.

My photos and art: http://wildmaven.org

Edit/Convert to profile, sRGB.

When working in photoshop in most cases, you are working in RGB, format for printing at home on epson printer or the like. Some pro labs, most are sRGB.
Logged


I have seen this with my images as well and work in sRGB in Photoshop.  No idea what causes it, but there is less detail in shadows here than in my image editing as well.  Prints the way I edit however, so I leave it because it works with my lab.  (This is also part of why most of my images look like they need a little more contrast on here, I think).

Hmmm.

Travis
Logged


interesting....
Logged


The sRGB/RGB issue could have been my problem.  I just checked my Photoshop Color Management settings, and they were not set to convert to my Working Space Profile when opening new files.  Could that be my problem?  Either way, I have changed it so I should be able to tell relativley soon if it makes a difference.

Travis
Logged


Hmmm, just for kicks I did the same as Marian with my last image posting.

Here is what mine looks like (opposite of Marian's now).

Very strange.

Travis
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
Logged


Edit/Convert to Profile/Choose sRGB,
work fine for the web.
Logged


Quote
Edit/Convert to Profile/Choose sRGB,

Yeah, that's what I did.  That's my point; this idea didn't work for me.  Any others?

Travis
Logged


What's weird is that the web version is lighter in Marian's and darker in Travis's. 

Here's my thought though, and I've had people disagree with it every time I've written it so feel free Cheesy Grin  It is very unlikely that your clients will be viewing your images on a calibrated monitor in Photoshop.  Make sure the images look right on your calibrated screen so that they'll look right when printed and explain to your clients that images in a web browser don't always match the color that they'll see when printed. I guess my point is that there's no way you'll know what the client's monitor is set to so you shouldn't stress too much about them seeing it exactly right. 
Logged


Ryan, I agree with you completely.  I always edit for printing and let my clients know that if there is a huge concern because it looks really bad on their monitor (assuming they would even notice), I will print a couple proofs to show them how they will print.

The bigger issue is when we are posting on here, I think.  We are all working on calibrated monitors and trying our best to give good, constructive, critiques.  If what we see on the forum isn't what the final print is going to look like; all of our comments on color balance, saturation, contrast, and even details in shadows and highlights is null and void.  Since the image is different in the web browser than in print, none of these things can be effectively critiqued.  I have personally seen this on several of my images, and it has been mentioned in several critiques; all with comments from me that sound like 'excuses'.  Which now maybe we can all see isn't always the case.

As far as why my image and Marian's image experienced a difference in how they changed; well, that is very interesting as well.  Mine almost always show up darker overall on here.  I often try to adjust the images in Levels before I post them so that they are more precise for web viewing so I can get better critiques; but that is usually what takes the contrast out of my images.

I'm just glad that I'm not the only one noticing a difference anymore.  Even if our issues are not exactly the same, there is a difference for sure.

Travis
Logged


Well, this is frustrating, especially because I am the one that keeps harping on Travis about putting more contrast in his images...  sorry.
Logged


Let's do a process of elimination.

Staring with, 8bit or 16 bit, stupid question, but, gota start somewhere.
Saves as jpeg
The image profile is RGB, when saving for web, needs to be sRGB

Wait a minute, RYAN, can windows conflict a color profile? I think it can.
Logged


Pages [1] 2 3
Top of Page