Should I buy this lens?

Should I buy this lens? Will I use it? I think I need it, but I have lived without it so far Smiley I feel like I need a new lens though and I can't spend a lot right now. I just need some variety. I already have some pretty good zoom.
http://www.adorama.com/NK5018AFDU.html

p.s. I won't necessarily buy it here, I just needed a link. I'll probably buy locally.
Logged


I use mine shooting in too dark venues that are too small for my 70-200 f2.8
if you need the low light lens, might I recommend the Nikkor 35mm f1.8? it allows you to get closer than the 50mm and is the same speed.
Logged

-----------------------------------
Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before. -- Mae West

Chattanooga Portrait Photographer BobEdens.com

The length is what I am not sure about. I really don't know which would be more useful.
I was guessing the 50 since I would use it for weddings.

Is the focus hard to nail so wide open? I know these are such basic questions, but I haven't expanded my lens repertoire much. Keep in mind I have to use auto focus. I, uh, have vision limitations Smiley
Logged


DOF f1.8, 50mm, set at 6m is 1.04m (from 5.53 to 6.56) (handy dandy iPod app)
(or count on pretty much nothing but the subject to be in focus)


Look at the exif data on the last bunch of photos, what was the zoom?
If you shot most of them over 100mm or under 30mm you won't like that 50mm lens.
Logged

-----------------------------------
Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before. -- Mae West

Chattanooga Portrait Photographer BobEdens.com

Ok, just flipped through my last session in Bridge to see. It was a combo studio/outdoor shoot.
Most studio stuff was 45-50 if it was full length. I zoomed in for closeups, but I could move closer.

The outdoor portion was decieving, not my normal way of shooting. It was dark and rainy, so I got in close so my aperature could open all the way, so I shot around 30. When I have more light I use a much longer length to throw the background out of focus, which I wouldn't have to do with a 1.8 lens.
Right?

My all-purpose lens is 18-135mm (kit lens, but I like the range), I can open it up to 3.5, which I do often. I have a longer lens, up to 200mm, but I rarely put it on my camera. I don't shoot wildlife or anything that requires me to be a distance.
 
Logged


I think you would be able to work with either the 50 or the 30ish primes. It's just a matter of getting used to the shallow DoF wide open, and making sure distortion won't be a problem at 30mm. I'd say get the best quality of the two you can afford. Buy it once.

FWIW I have a 50/1.4 prime that I use quite a bit. But I also have fast lenses to cover from 10mm-200mm if I need.
Logged

-John
Sarcasm, frustrating the clueless since 3000 b.c.
"There is no Un-Suck filter" David duChemin

Check out the new blog. http://www.jklebphoto.wordpress.com

The 50mm 1.8 or the 35mm are both top end glass, cheap because they are simple not because of the components. The 35mm is a newer lens, might have a faster motor in it.
It is one of Nikon's most popular lenses. Sigma makes a 35mm EX as well. Google reviews and pick the one that "they" like best.

That little prime lens will blow you away how sharp the images are compared to your zoom.
Logged

-----------------------------------
Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before. -- Mae West

Chattanooga Portrait Photographer BobEdens.com

I bought the 50mm Canon equivalent and love it. Doesn't get used much for normal shooting but is great to have when it's needed and small enough where it doesn't ever leave my bag.
Logged


Yeah I think it will be a good addition to help give more variety to what I can do, and it's a small investment and yeah, I didn't think about it being a small lightweight lens to carry, that will be nice.
Logged


I know this is late coming but I bought the Canon equivalent lens and use it all that time.  It is my main lens.  The only time I don't use it is when I need a tele/wide.  I just use my feet as the zoom.
Logged

If you always do what you have always done, you will always get what you have always got.

Actually it's not late at all Robert, I haven't purchased it yet. I know it's not expensive, but I still need to wait a little longer until I can pay for it.
I am glad to know you get a lot of use out of it.
Logged


Have you brought one now!  I have to say that I liked the 50f1.8 until I shot with the 50f1.4!  I know that it is more money, but for it is worth every penny. 

The f1.4 is sharper, has better (brighter) color rendition, focuses closer and is built better.

The f1.8 is a nice lens that you can do some neat things with, the f1.4 is a great lens that I could shoot with all day.

BTW:  You don't the new "G" lens if you get the f1.4.  Look around and find the "D" version.

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com