Singh-Ray Vari ND Filter

For those of you who are outdoor shooters, weddings, nature etc.
Have a look at this, http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html

Now, you will need a few $$$ but, it sure looks like a very nice tool for the tool box.

santa's list
#1 Vari-ND 77mm

Mike
Logged


That's really something!  Of course, so is the price . . . I wonder why they are only in 77mm?  It's the same mount as a polarizer and they should be able to make the glass in any size.

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

Nice for my 70-200mm VR  Cool and future 28-70mm f/2.8

For now, just dreaming.

Mike
Logged


Right, it will fit my 80-200, but is too small for my 28-105 and far too large for my 18-125!  It is also far, far, too large for my 300.  I suspect that it will be too large for the 18-200 in my future as well.  Of course, at these prices, I am only likely to buy it for one of these lenses . . . but, which one . . .

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

Why not bu step down rings for it, but the largest size you need and then buy a step down ring i.e 77 to 62 that way you can still use it
Logged


It is nice to have, but who wants to pay $340 or, even worse, $390 for a filter one seldom uses. Or your hobby should be photographing waterfalls, all in the same way. It is like so many gadgets, once you buy them, you oput them in the camera bag and they seldom come out. They only add to the weight, although your purse will be much less in weight.

Additional question, I will pose it again in a different part of the forum, but does anyone know about a Schwarzschild effect in digital?
Logged


Cool!
I'm in the market for an ND filter and I want something that will drop the exposure a lot.
8stops on this bad boy?? Sweet!
But the price is too high for something I know I will drop out of the side of a canoe or in the rapids.
I know Cokin doesn't come close to the quality of Singh-Ray but I've been looking at getting a 2stop and 3stop (#153 and #154)
Any other suggestions?
Any ideas on one that might fit my Cokin P holder?
Logged


Yes there is, I saw it the other day, well, I also forgot who had it. LOL

Cokin P, I have one too, 58, 62, 77 adaptor rings, looking to rid the 58 and 62 need it? let me know.

Ever tried the door screen method for portraits.? Nice soft results.

Mike
Logged


That filter is a masterpiece in optical engineering.  I use it all the time when I a shooting brides by window light and I want to include a beautiful window and view in the composition, not only as an off camera light source.  I like the 77mm size because you can always use a step-down ring for smaller diameter lenses.  It is better, however to use the square filters with the adapter intended for that configuration.  This enables you to slide the filter vertically or laterally to apply the neutral density exactly where it is needed- you can previewed this placement with the depth of field preview control on your camera stopped down to your working aperture.

The reason I like the Sing-Ray products is that the effects are seamless and the optical quality is excellent.  When the indoor to outdoor ratio is high, theses filters save the day- same with hot skies. 

The price is rather high but theses filters have saved me many hours of burning in on the old enlarger and with digital, as we all know, blown out areas are nasty business.  These filters also help me when I need to make transparencies where there are no corrections available.

Ed Shapiro
Logged

Ed Shapiro
The Hintonburg Studio
Suite 201  78 Hinton Avenue North
Ottawa, Ontario CANADA  K1Y 0Z8
613-792-4837    Email:  edshapiro@rogers.com

Ed, aren't you mistaken with another filter? As far as I can see this one is the same density over the whole surface. Or I should be mistaken. As far as I know you mean a half coloured filter.
That is something useful!

Leen
Logged


Hi Leen-  When I saw the term- Vari-  I assumed that we were talking about the graduated filters- those are the ones I refer to in my post.   As far as a single density ND filter there are others on the market that will do the job.  I do however, prefer the Sing-Ray and the B+W filters and some of the other high end brands because of their optical quality.  I always though that if one invests in top of the line lenses, there is no use buying filters of a lesser quality and end up degrading the image quality because of poor optical performance of the filter. 

Whenever you add a more air to glass surfaces to an optical system there is a greater chance of some quality loss due to some shortcoming in the manufacture of the filter.  I like "dyed in the glass" filters because the don't de-laminate as do the ones with a colored optical plastic or gel sandwiched between to elements of glass.  I have Zeiss (Hasselblad) filters for over 30 years that are still in fine shape. 

I have invested in some pretty expensive polarizers as well- I need them for my architectural, commercial , and art reproduction.  Theses to have given me years of service and have never introduced any optical distortion or loss of sharpness.

I don't consider myself an equipment freak by any means and I improvise when I can- especially for odd jobs that I don't get all the time but when it comes to things that I place between the sublet and the front element of my lenses, I am very discriminating.

I am sorry that I want on about a filter that was not mentioned in the original post but I hope this information is useful to someone out there.

Best regards,   Ed Shapiro 
Logged

Ed Shapiro
The Hintonburg Studio
Suite 201  78 Hinton Avenue North
Ottawa, Ontario CANADA  K1Y 0Z8
613-792-4837    Email:  edshapiro@rogers.com

Hi Ed, so did I on seeing "vari-", but as I have more problems with the language, I have to take more time to read and sometimes it pays off. I had to read it 3 times before I understood. Grin

Leen
Logged