Using a reflector

Pages [1] 2
Here's a close-up of a model. She's holding the reflector for the fill light and the sun as the hair light.

Question, is it incorrect to see the reflector reflecting in the eyes.?

Mike
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
Logged


You may get some argument on this, but in my view: no, there is nothing wrong with seeing the reflection in the eyes.  But, I also don't have the problem that many do with multiple catch lights in the eyes.  I don't think that there is any need to have only one light source visible in an image.

I am not 100% sure about this image though.  No problem with the reflactor as "fill" however, in this shot it looks like the reflector is the brightest light source, making it you main, not your fill.  I do have a problem with look that you have from the "bottom main".  I understand the simplicity of having the model hold the reflector, but moving it lower or farther away may have lessened the light coming from it so that would be a fill instead.

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

Ed is right, you are lighting her from the bottom. I don't either object to multiple catch lights in the eyes, as long as the strongest reflection comes from the main lght source.

Leen
« Last Edit: March 30, 2007, 01:25:32 AM by Leen Koper »
Logged


The skinny on catchlights is: "Generally speaking, the eyes should follow the direction of the nose.  For females there should be slightly more whites of the eyes on one side than on the other.  The eyes should never be turned so far in their sockets that there is no white area on one side.  A slightly higher camera angle will give more whites at the bottom than at the top which is more appealing in images of young females. Catchlights.  One catchlight per eye suggests thoughtfulness; more than one creates a look a merriment.  In multiple catchlight images, the catchlight from the main light should be the brightest." (From my "Rules of Portraiture" tutorial.)

In addition to the reflector being the main light there is a highlight on her left cheek which can easily be removed with the Patch tool in Photoshop.

Keep it up!  Your thinking!

Benji
Logged


I don't think you can do this without the catchlight from the reflector in her eyes, unless you're going for a horror movie thing..


pretty girl, nice shot.
Logged

-----------------------------------
"I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one heck of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult. "- EB White

Chattanooga Photographer www.BobEdens.com

Pretty Lady and lovely expression!

The lighting is rather strange.  Besides the strange directionality there is a disunity of lighting in that there is a kicker highlight on one side of the face.

I am not saying that you must only use orthodox or classical lighting but this lighting results in a less than flattering rendition of the face.  A reflector placed under the face is oftentimes used to reduce the shadow area under the chin in high or medium key fashion and glamor portraiture but it does not overpower the main light which is usually a butterfly or modified butterfly lighting.

Ed Shapiro
Logged

Ed Shapiro
The Hintonburg Studio
Suite 201  78 Hinton Avenue North
Ottawa, Ontario CANADA  K1Y 0Z8
613-792-4837    Email:  edshapiro@rogers.com

Nothing wrong with a highlight showing in the lower eye. However yours is rather a pinpoint whereas when a reflector of some sort is held under the face or on the subjects lap, it tends to be a wider rectangle that looks best. As Ed mentions, this is commonly used in commercial portrait shoots with variations on the theme - and is quite often used with a light above the lens whether directly above or off to the side a bit. In that way you have a dominant highlight at the top of the iris and a rectangular lightening of the iris at the bottom. On the other hand, there are many famous portrait photographers who have used lighting and reflectors unconventionally and have famous prints with pin point highlights, low highlights, and no highlights. Generally I think that they succeed because of the dramatic effect of the lighting - - - which may be what is missing in the shot above. I personally would clone out the 2 white dots in this case as they don't really add anything to the portrait.


Sorry to keep digging up this old shot as an example - but I don't do studio work like this any longer and only have a few of my sample images from my studio days. This shot used flat lighting with a softbox above the lens and a silver reflector on an angle below the lens. There was only a narrow slot of maybe a foot or so between the two light sources for my lens to shoot through. The reflector coming in low brightens the eyes nicely but the main light has the dominant highlight. Actually many commercial photographers are now using Photoshop to add a natural looking rectangular highlight to the bottom of the iris to brighten it.   
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2007, 10:43:09 PM by robertwatcher »
Logged


Moderator
Pro Critique
As far as I am concerned, you can keep bring that image to the table!

I think that Ed S. and Rob are pretty much agreeing with what I said, only they have said it better.  The problem here is that the light from the reflector has come to dominate this image.  When I saw Monte Zucker use a reflector below the face during a class a few years ago, he may have used a silver reflector in a studio shot where he had complete control over everything, but I remember that he used a white reflector outdoors  where there was less control.  Well . . . he still seemed to have complete control when we were outdoors, but the rest of in class clearly didn't!

I guess my question, thown back to Mike is: What type of reflector was this? 

I certainly wouldn't say that this is a tool that you shouldn't use, but I would like to see you try to figure out how to lessen the effect.

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

Pro Critique
I'll be back, just taken in what was said.
School's calling.

Mike
Logged


Pro Critique
Already,
A 42 inch white gold reflector was used, white side.
Model at inside edge of gazebo and facing in. I'm inside, shade. Sun was used as hair light, reflector used to shine sun in face.
No flash was used.
Model was holding reflector at about belly level and reflector at an angle to direct sunlight reflection.

Hope this helps.

Mike
Logged


Moderator
Pro Critique
Mike,

That paints the picture!  I was hoping that it would have been as simple as telling you that you should have used a white reflector instead of silver or gold but you got that part right.

All this means is that, in this case, the reflector over powered your available light on her face and acted as your main.  That won't work if the reflector is placed below the face.  As an option, with an assitant or stand to hold the reflector, you could have moved the reflector into a better position and allowed to become your main light.  Or, by placing in yet another location, it could have acted as fill.

Unfortunatly, it just dosen't work where it was!

Ed
Logged

Ed Farmer
Mount Laurel, New Jersey

www.edfarmerphotography.com
www.photoartsforum.com

Pro Critique
Here's the before. Nothing done, just a crop and resize for web.

Maybe this will help as the other had a make-over. Notice she has allergies, wrinkles, yellow teeth etc. Fashion gurus for magazines make over their models. So, how's the make-over up-top.?

Mike
Attachments
This post contains 1 attachment, but as a guest you cannot view attachments. Signing up at PhotoArtsForum will allow you to view attachments and post your own messages. If you already are a member at PhotoArtsForum please login.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2007, 08:38:43 AM by Mike Hodgson »
Logged


Thanks for posting the original image Mike. It supports what I mentioned about the reflector source being too small. As a result it hasn't accomplished its mission as a reflector as there is still way too much shadow and bags. A white reflector wouldn't help here - only make it worse. Wehn I use reflectors under the face I like to keep them no lower than the lap of the person when they are sitting down - and directly under them on a good reflective angle depending on the main light source. Many times I will have it only a foot or two away from the bottom of the subjects chin. This is even the case with a silver reflector which is what I generally use for more snap in commercial style images (white reflector would be more for one light portraits).

By having the reflector source close to the subject you end up with that broad rectangle of a highlight in the lower eye that is so appealing. It is good to remember that just as with the main light, the closer the reflector is to th subject the softer and more deep the light reflected is. If I use a white reflector (only for side reflecting not from underneath) it is generally almost touching the side of the subjects face to get the look I am after. Just remember that if you place your strobe lights 10 to 15 feet away from the subect you will get small highlights, harsh and more contrasty lighting - - - same goes with reflectors. It's all physics of light regardless of what the source is. Of course if the pinlight is the effect you wanted then none of this matters.  Cool

BTW - you did a really nice job of retouching Mike.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2007, 09:12:10 AM by robertwatcher »
Logged


Pro Critique
The reflector should have been held at Breast level? instead of belly level? Just trying to get what you mentioned.

I just had a look at the pin light all have mentioned, I opened the original file, what I see is the reflector and the pin light, is the snow on the other side, behind me in the distance, looking out of the gazebo, scenery.

That something I should be aware of as well.

42 inch is too small, I need a 60 inch.?

Thanks for all the advise, alot to consider and take in.

Mike

Logged


It may be that the pin light is a reflection of something bright (reflector acting like a mirror). The fact remains that however your reflector was placed or whatever size or material it was made out of - - - it is definitely not doing its job in this shot. The rectangular highlights are barely visible (although now you mention I can kind of see them) and there is not enough softening of shadows on the areas under her eyes (requiring you to do  lot of retouching work). The reason we generally use a reflector under a face in model shots is so we have a certain look in the eye and so we don't have to retouch skin.

All I was pointing out is that like a main strobe light in a softbox, your most effective quality of fill light from a reflector will be with the largest source and the closest distance you can have. Those values can only be determined by you playing with the reflector and trying different things and seeing what brings the best success. I'm just relaying some of the principles to be aware of when experimenting. There are no hard and fast rules and what everyone wants out of a lighting effect is different.

----

Update - you're making me analize this too much Mike  Grin. I'm just not one to spend time analizing and figuring out every nuannce - I just come to a quick conclusion with what I see if front of me and respond based on that. So don't look too deeply into my replies. When I now look at your original, I believe that what you have is shadows under the eye that are cast up as a result of your reflector being the main harsh light (an effect used in horror movies of old). As I mentioned in my first reply, you would do well to have your main light in front and the reflector as the balance for that light.   Here you obviously have light blocked off from overhead and are using the reflector to redirect light in to her face - thus it has become a main light - not a fill light as I suspect was intended. This would have worked if your reflector was vertical and redirecting the light from that angle. PLAY PLAY PLAY - - - IS ALL I CAN SAY
« Last Edit: March 31, 2007, 10:04:07 AM by robertwatcher »
Logged


Pages [1] 2
Top of Page