Workflow

Lets cratique workflow, see if we can speed each other up
Invision 500 or more photos from one shoot.

Here's mine, tell me what I could do better and why.

Copy the RAW files from the cards to the hard drive
Burn the Raw files to CD or DVD
open the folder in Lightroom
set white balance, exposure, sharpen copy settings.
either paste the settings or delete the image
before going to the next image check/fix the crop
go back through all the images marking the ones that need further editing
export the images that need extra editing
edit those photos with CS3
back to lightroom export the rest of the images that are "keepers"

folder is now full of edited, corrected and excellent photos.
Logged

-----------------------------------
"I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one heck of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult. "- EB White

Chattanooga Photographer www.BobEdens.com

We Yankees spell, Cratique, "Critique"
Hey, too much Possum, ooooooops, cajun chicken.   Big Grin
Logged


We Yankees spell, Cratique, "Critique"
Hey, too much Possum, ooooooops, cajun chicken.   Big Grin

I asked Ryan for a spell checker so everyone else could understand me, but it didn't happen... [shrug]

Logged

-----------------------------------
"I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one heck of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult. "- EB White

Chattanooga Photographer www.BobEdens.com

But then we'd miss out on the fun Smiley  It's still on my list, just haven't had a chance to get around to adding the spell checker.

...

Cards are dumped to hard drive using DIM.  The files get renamed using date, time, and a serial during the dump and the card number is put as the first part of the file name.

Files are copied to 2 sets of either CD or DVD depending on how many images.  One copy goes in the client folder, one goes on a spindle.

Files are moved to a network drive where they become part of my backup routine.  Nightly my computer backs up my photo drive to a USB drive and also to a remote server.

Load the folder into Bridge (don't have Lightroom yet, but it is on my to buy list).  Every file gets tagged with 2 stars.   

I go through and look at each image in the preview window and either tag it using the stars (1 = bad, 3+ = show client, 4+ = my guesses on what the client will like best, 5+ = into my portfolio) or delete it.  Any technical flaws will be deleted if I don't think it's fixable. 

All files that weren't deleted get renamed to YYYYMMDD-serial.ext, so the first shot from an assignment today would be 20080501-0001.CRW. 

Filter so I'm only looking at 3+ stars.  Those I will go through and make sure color and exposure are right using the RAW converter. 

Run the 3+ images through Photoshop actions to scale them down to web sized and copy to an empty directory. 

Upload the converted JPGs to my proofing site and email the client a link.
Logged


question Ryan:
Quote
All files that weren't deleted get renamed to YYYYMMDD-serial.ext, so the first shot from an assignment today would be 20080501-0001.CRW.

So now you've two copies of the same picture with different names?

I too rename my photos but I always leave the four digit number camera index because I've lost photos that way before and had to view the month to find the one I needed.
Logged

-----------------------------------
"I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one heck of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult. "- EB White

Chattanooga Photographer www.BobEdens.com

Pretty much.  But the only time that I'd go back to the DVD would be if the files get messed up before I get them on network or if I delete one accidentally.  Bridge has an option of saving the original filename in the XMP data so the original name is there if I need it, or at least I can get pretty close by looking at the files around it.

The only exceptions are when the images are purely personal - dogs playing in the yard, that sort of thing.  I normally leave them with the filenames that DIM assigns.  I like the shorter versions for clients though because it's a lot easier for them to say "image 0102" than then really long, ugly filenames that they come off the card as.  The CRW_#### filename isn't ever used in my workflow.
Logged